Update

We have updated the content of our program. To access the current Software Engineering curriculum visit curriculum.turing.edu.

Static Comp Peer Review

Static Comp Peer Review

Eval Grading Rubric (20 minutes each)

For this project, you get to be in charge of the eval! This is a great opportunity to review another person’s code and assess something that isn’t your own. This is a common thing you’ll do when working on your group projects and when you have a job. Assessing code and seeing what works and what could potentially be improved on is beneficial for you and your peers! Here’s a rubric with some questions to think about as your partner presents their project and you assess.

Write out at least three or more points of feedback in each section.

Design/Comp Recreation

  • How close does their site match the comp? Are there small details that are missing?
    • Pay attention to spacing, readability, sizing/positioning of elements
  • Is your partner’s site responsive? Are elements logically spaced as the window gets smaller?

HTML Structure/Style

HTML Style Guide

  • Take a look through the style guide and check if your partner’s code follows these rules.
  • Are they using mostly semantic HTML? (staying away from nested divs, using correct elements, etc.)
  • Is the HTML structure clean and steers clear from unnecessary nesting?

CSS Structure/Style

CSS Style Guide

  • Take a look through the style guide and check if your partner’s code follows these rules.
  • Are the styles organized in a logical way? Are the properties for each rule organized alphabetically or by similar groups (widths and heights, margins and paddings, etc.)
  • Do the class names clearly explain what elements they are meant to style?
  • Are classes that share similar styles grouped together? If multiple classes share similar styles, how could it be refactored into one class?
  • Are there instances where your partner is using !important?

Lesson Search Results

Showing top 10 results